« September 2009 | Main | November 2009 »

3 posts from October 2009

October 26, 2009

Midwest uses mobile different than East Coast

Mobile
On a recent family vacation to DC/NYC, I couldn't help but notice that people on the East Coast use their mobile devices far differently than we do here in the Midwest. I cannot go so far as to attribute it to a reason "why",  but I'm going to guess. Nevertheless, there was a clear difference in what people were doing with their mobile devices. 

First, what are people doing differently in NYC/DC than here in the Midwest?

First and foremost, I saw more people using mobile devices as an entertainment medium or device. While a crude measurement, I saw many people connected to their phones via headsets. Admittedly, I was looking over some shoulders. So I saw this first hand that people were listening to music or watching videos. This means a number of things. Though on the surface this may not look like a big, difference, it is huge. Entertainment on your phone, whether video or music, means that your phone is hooked up, most likely, to your desktop computer. If it is not connected to your desktop computer, at the very least it requires an internet connection. *Note: In the subway systems in both DC/NYC, internet access was not available to the devices, where I was noticing most of this use. Even most people that I know here in Cincinnati that own iPhones, which means they both a desktop and internet connection, I don't often see them using their devices for entertainment. Entertainment goes beyond the basic use of the phone as a text, email and phone device.

My suspicion in this case is that as people have more down time with their phone, waiting and commuting on public transportation. They will be exploiting the capability of their mobile devices. Before I travel, I load up my iPhone with video and audio. Before I had an iPhone, I did the same with my Treo device. Point being, I believe that travel and commuting gives you both the reason and downtime to figure out how to load up your mobile device. When you are car commuting, you simply don't have time to interact with the phone as much. So the need obviously isn't as great. Additionally I would add that commuting on a regular basis also requires a notion of efficiency. You're always going to take your mobile device with you, why not let it do more?

The last thing that I'd add here is that this wasn't just iPhones. I saw people with Nokia products, BlackBerry Devices and Motorola devices. iPhones are easy targets to know why and how people are using their devices differently, but loading up some of the other devices simply isn't as easy. As I mentioned, in the Midwest, there is less of a need. Our commutes here are largely in our personal vehicles. Simply said, the need is not as great. Most of the folks that I know, even with smart devices, they use them primarily for email, text and phone service. Clearly, the needs and use are different. The more that people expect and want of their phones, the opportunity/need will exist for developers and marketers.

~marty follow me on twitter @marty_b

October 20, 2009

DroidDoes Not

Verizon-droid-does-commercial
My only estimate for this commercial is that Verizon and Google could not come to an agreement or they were caught in a time crunch. With that said, I cannot believe that the DroidDoes campaign made it out of the gate. Here are Verizon and Google ready to take on the iPhone, coming out of the gates with guns blazing, calling out the iPhone for everything that it doesn't do. Showing a super-sexy futuristic television promo and then telling you to head to the website, www.droiddoes.com. When you get there, you are met by a remnant of the television piece, once you move past this, you come upon an email box where you can enter more information to be sent to you via email or text when it is ready. Again, my guess is they could not agree or it was caught in legal. Nevertheless, let me give you five solutions that would have been better.

  1. Join the revolution. Start today, friend us on Facebook where we'll give away a phone for every {insert number} people that join the revolution.
  2. Find us on Twitter...
  3. Want to see more, Google Android Video to see what pre-release footage is out there (of course legalese it).
  4. Show your own videos. Something that you shot, forget video, how about the anatomy of a droid in a cool Flash piece? Beyond just meta and description tags, you should have some content that is getting indexed behind the scenes for search.
  5. Want to hit an iPhone with a donkey punch, show a planned coverage map.

Look, these are not the best ideas by any means. However, sticking a 2001 coming soon email box for a release like this falls into the lame spectrum. I'm excited about the phone. I actually own a G1. I also have an iPhone. I'm a pretty solid voice of reason in this case. I went to the site with tons of expectations, but was let down. I'll leave this post with this: if you are going to compete with the iPhone and the kids at Apple, I think you're going to need to step up your marketing efforts.

follow me on twitter @marty_b

October 14, 2009

2009: The Year Cannes Mattered Again

by jasonCannes-gold-cyber-lion

This was going to be a joke post of sorts because, happily, one of my projects won a gold Cyber Lion at Cannes this year (my agency’s first, so a big deal to me...check it out here). You know, like, “Now that I’ve won one they’re suddenly relevant.”

 In fact, awhile back, I found myself nodding my head when Bob “I Review TV Spots For a Living” Garfield wrote an article that said (and I’m paraphrasing here), “Cannes and other award shows don’t matter because consumers don’t care about TV spots and other brand-type films.”

But then I saw all the other Cyber Lion winners, and realized…it changed this year.

 The thing is, in just one year, there’s been a huge transformation in what wins in digital (confirmed by one of the judges during the event). Criteria to win went from “a clever idea or beautiful execution” to “what will consumers willingly and actively engage with.” Whether it’s delivered on a site, in a banner, or wherever.

 THAT IS A STEP CHANGE.

 You see it in winners like:

The concerts-in-a-banner for Axion bank.

Or Whopper Sacrifice, as written about in AdWeek.

And my personal favorite, Why So Serious from 42 Entertainment.

And last but not least is my agency’s winner, Can Hands from Pringles, as written about by some of my favorite bloggers over at American Copywriter

Those winners suggest that, to win in the digital space, you have to deliver great content—whether your vehicle is a banner ad, a short film, a game, or whatever. If your target doesn’t WANT it, or if it’s interruptive with nothing in it for the consumer, it can’t be great digital. Soon, that will be the requirement to be great creative. Period.

A high bar, but one I’m happy to bang my head into trying to get over.